Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono published his paper as part of Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021 (ICLHR 2021).

Based on Article 24C, paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which is reaffirmed in Article 10, paragraph (1) letters a to d Law 24/2003, one of the powers of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia is to decide disputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution. From 2003 to the present, 26 cases resolving disputes over the authority of state institutions granted by the 1945 Constitution have been accepted and decided. The verdict results were granted in one case, three cases were rejected, 16 were not accepted, five were withdrawn, and one was not authorised by the Court. From the variety of decisions in those cases, it is essential to study why this happened. This study is descriptive and analytic. It uses the juridical method and desk study. This paper will focus on the analysis of the decisions of disputes over the authority of state institutions. In addition, this paper will focus on seeing the consistency of the Constitutional Court decisions from the first to the last judgment. It is concluded that the Constitutional Court’s decisions in disputes over the authority of state institutions are consistent. In its previous decision 1/SKLN-XVII/2019, the Constitutional Court adhered to its prior decisions. It creates legal certainty in disputes over the authority of state institutions.

Volume TitleProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021 (ICLHR 2021)

SeriesAdvances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

Publication Date23 November 2021ISBN978-94-6239-454-4ISSN2352-5398DOI10.2991/assehr.k.211112.033How to use a DOI?

Copyright© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.Open AccessThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.